If the very idea of your paycheck provider cutting off your Internet makes you hot in the face and inspires the urge to start blathering about Freedom of Speech and censorship and "What is this, China?" and "I'm not a child!" blah blah blah … just shut up. Seriously. How weird is it that we've even formed the concept that we have a right to hang out with our friends — albeit in cyberspace — on the company's dime?
Msnbc.com wants Newsviners to discuss this story. Do you think it's OK to hang out on Facebook or MySpace during work hours? Should businesses block social networking sites from their employees? Got any funny stories about surfing on the company dime?
Gee, where are these companies which inspect your every keystroke?
One of them is right here in Seattle. Boeing. Pretty standard for many of the private contractors in the DC area that work on government contracts like SAIC and CSC.
It's the same for us "blue badges", Ted. Still, I agree that they pay me to design planes, not to chat and be social unless it's on my break.
Now you have me totally confused Jay..."Blue Badges" designing planes ?
I thought you were the guy with the three speeding tickets over the last six years ? ++cough++
Eastside Blue Badges do other things.....
Speeding tickets? You got the wrong guy, partner. I have had only one in the last 6 years (knocking on wood). But, yeah, here on the BCA side, we blue badges design the planes (with contribution from our "partners", although the oversight remains here in the Puget Sound area).
You have a twin then....Like a Seattle PI reader maybe....:-)
I routinely visit with my neighbors and friends and family and hold no criminal record (aside from three speeding tickets over the last six years).
Let's see... Growing up, I watched the Road Runner and Coyote mercilessly try to do one another in....
Posted by Jay Keggerlord at 11/5/07 6:16 a.m.
In the majority of cases, there is no real need for an employee to have unlimited Internet access. After all, you are being paid to work, not play. I absolutely agree that employers should be able to block Internet sites if they feel employees are abusing the privilege. Facebook, MySpace, EBay, etc., etc. Name 3 jobs that rely on access to any of those sites to be successful.
I get paid for my ideas, freelance, so I bill hours accordingly. I use my own laptop and files where I keep all of my work, so I do not have to have to suffer someone over my back. I will never, ever put up with the demeaning B-@!$%# that passes for labor relationships these days, and I am soon to begin a project with my oldest son so he never has to either. It's called opting out, and the reason facebook and myspace is the enemy to corporate PTB is that I can make more money networking and marketing on my own than some office gig can offer me.
With rates as low as they are, investors abound, looking for somebody with an idea or project who will pay more than a money market or CD.
Thanks but no thanks, corporate slavers.
I'm at work right now, I'm on facebook right now. So what? My boss knows and as long as I get things done and stay productive there isn't a problem. I think its nice to have, it gets your mind off work for a few mins here and there to check whats going on in the social network world. Unless employees are on it constantly, it shouldn't be a big deal. If I had a boss that was that uptight or worked for a company that was overly controlling like that, I'd quit.
Exactly.
Plus, no actual wage increase. Decrease in benefits. Increase in working hours. My boss leaves at 3:30pm every Friday. You know what? I'll hit MySpace if I want, and my boss knows it. He knows I'm also a very productive employee who gets precious few 'extras' in today's economic climate.
gergjarvis.... Your boss is wrong to allow you to be on Facebook and other sites. You are paid to do a job. If you have time to be on Facebook, then you have time for another assignment.
You better hope that the company doesn't start looking at the bottom line, otherwise you will be soon quitting. Especially when they turn off your so-called "privilege".
Your future boss.
'Do you think it's OK to hang out on Facebook or MySpace during work hours?'
They should be fired on the spot if caught.
Besides, MySpace is nothing but a kazillion people all waving their hands at the same time saying 'Hey, look at ME!'
And Facebook keeps all your data permanently, even if you 'delete' (ha ha) your account.
(Warning: if you question this statement, I'm going to put up the link to my article from last October where I warned Viners about this. Here's a hint: When you quit Facebook, the last thing they tell you is you can re-activate your original account simply by entering your username and password. And your profile and all other entries remain the same. How do you think they DO that?)
Gregjarvis. As a business owner I can tell you the employees that spend any time playing on the net are just minutes from being fired. You may think this is harsh but the corporate world is unforgiving and work is what the employee is being paid for. Time to grow up and get to work not run off to myspace anytime you think the boss is not looking. If you have time for messing around you have time for more work. After a detailed accounting of office productivity I can tell you who is working or not and who is keeping their job. The future of any company depends on productivity and employee dedication to that end not some immature need to social network.
I don't think facebook is that INTERESTING enough to be on for more than 10 minutes at a time. So I don't really get what the people that are on there for a significant amount are doing (unless it's the facebook chat that was just implemented) but I feel that during lunch hours (11-2) internet should be freed up. I can understand if me logging in to facebook first thing in the morning, but on my lunch, I should be able to socialize and shop online all I want.
Deelite,
Even during lunch time, you are using company resources. How would you feel if they said you could us the internet during this time, online if you paid an access fee per day? Lets say, $5 per day. I would guess that you would wait until you got home.
Hetep and Respect Jasmin, the most flexible trust based work environments attract and retain the best individual contributors. in any case, Restrictions don't typically stop employees from doing what they are going to do.
The reality is Time and Minutes Employees don't typically have time to be doing anything other then what is assigned. If they do, it is because of a lack of work or a management scheduling deficiency. Internet marshal law is not a solution in either case. Salaried staff are paid for a body of work, weather it takes them 8 hours or 18 hours, how they manage there time is, and should be, their call.
Cultural Literacy Minute: Motivated staff will always do more on their own then you can ever force them to do.
My all of clients have always had firewall rules to block sites. Mostly, it is the obvious HR issue (porn, etc), bandwidth hogging (music and video download sites), potential liability issues (IM) and a few other categories of sites. My current client does block things like MySpace, Facebook and other social sites (even parts of Yahoo). That is probably more because there is no business reason to be on them (as doc stated above).
Inconvenient? Sometimes. Do I have a problem with it? Not at all. It is their network and they can choose to manage it however they choose.
Well, here we block YouTube for a very obvious reason. If everybody was watching streaming videos, there wouldn't be enough bandwidth to send out the work-related e-mails.
I work for an Ad Agency and we use Facebook as a medium to push campaigns and thus it would defeat the purpose to censor the access to that site or for any social network fr that mater. In this era of social networking from my perspective as to what I do for a living I am constantly on these sites in the name of research...haha! Seriously though aas another poster put it, if your work is getting done then it shouldn't be an issue. When it starts affecting your productivity then its something that becomes a concern.
Most of the people that I work with they are already blocked from sites like MySpace, FaceBook and YouTube partially because of bandwidth issues on the network, loss of employee time and increased chance of picking up a virus or spyware. Very few have a problem with that as they still have full access to sites such as MSN or Newsvine or more important for most is their email service or sites like Amazon.com especially around holidays.
There will always be those few that abuse the system and spend hours just on the Internet and those need to be handled on a case by case incident. Same thing is true of cell phone users at work that browse the Internet via their cell phone, that gets really tricky to handle as there is no way to monitor that unless you physically observe it.
However in seeing some of the user statistics from Facebook users, it is always amazing to me just how many hours some people do spend on Facebook.
Actually I could say the same about me on Newsvine.....Guess I better stop while I am still ahead ☺
There will always be those few that abuse the system and spend hours just on the Internet and those need to be handled on a case by case incident. Same thing is true of cell phone users at work that browse the Internet via their cell phone, that gets really tricky to handle as there is no way to monitor that unless you physically observe it.
Agree completely Tedd. It's obvious from the comments that each particular organization has its own set of business requirements, IT regulations and company culture. There is no "one size fits all" strategy.
And as you've mentioned, the size of the organization plays a role, too. In a small business, it's easier to allow employees to surf a little here and there. I do it, so I can't see stopping my employees/subcontractors from doing the same. Of course, like the earlier poster, I own a graphic/web design/marketing business, so knowing about what's happening on the web and social networks is very important to the business.
Most of the people that I work with they are already blocked from sites like MySpace, FaceBook and YouTube partially because of bandwidth issues on the network
I ought to have read further before I made my comment above.
I ought to have read further before I made my comment above.
I might help to have a bit more up to date UI also instead of almost DOS like comment strings, rather hard to read all the comments and then go back and find the one you were planning on commenting on in the first place...We are not that short on bandwidth. Plus I think...we are on new servers this weekend, maybe...
Plus I think...we are on new servers this weekend, maybe...
Oooh! Hardware upgrade!!
I hope they're physical servers and not VMs (virtual machines). At work, we've bought into the whole virtualization craze, and, while it's a good idea when it comes to the many underutilized servers we have/had, but I wouldn't be virtualizing critical or high-utilization servers. The Newsinve team seems pretty competent, though (more competent than we are in government, I'd hope).
New Servers and they got a good deal on Vista I heard also....
Of course, I have to be different. LOL My office encourages folks to belong to social networks . . .our corporate office is even doing seminars on how to use Facebook and LinkedIn.
LinkedIn is a totally different concept. That we use all the time. That is a professional tool and is great for Networking and also for job hunting. Its not aimed at the Teenage set at all like Facebook is, very different use.
Many LinkIn folks are adding Facebook professionally. I have a professional Facebook page. I just don't hug, kiss or take sex quizzes on that one. :D
I have only used Facebook a few times and that was since I joined NV, I was not aware of that. The only Facebook site I ever saw that looked professional was Mike D's. The rest have been kinda loud....
Nope...Mike D. has a site on FaceBook is the one I am talking about, it does not look like Facebook at all.
I was not aware you could do any major customization of Facebook or than just not having a lot of modules. Got a link?
I'll do. someplace...It was on his homepage and maybe Newsvine, It had a Funny title, something like "Mike D Tackles Facebook" Its been a while since I saw it...Let me do some searching, I know I saved it as I was amazed at what he did.
hint hint have you seen mine...(~)
I used to spend as much time on Facebook as I did on Newsvine...
I agree that it should not be used in worktime unless your on a break or have the express permission to do so because it enhances your company , you or your computer skills..
hint hint have you seen mine..
I am hoping your asking Gwenny that question, I am somewhat of a old fashioned boring engineer type, I still prefer the opposite sex...sorry !
@barrys-rutherford
No....I cannot find you on Facebook ? on you in the NV group ?
try barryrutherford
I still cannot find you ! Unless for some reason that is looking at US only ? that is strange ??
As a manager of a technical team, I expect a lot from my employees. This means that if a business critical system goes down at 4:50pm, they are going to put in the time to resolve it. When their colleagues in finance or in operations are walking out the door at 5:01 or 5:30, if the issue is not resolved and it impacts mission-critical systems that have to be up 24x7, they are going to stay late. However, because I demand that of my team, I also need to be flexible in other ways. I make sure we have fun, take pride in our work and therefore minimize those emergency situations where they have to stay late in the first place, and I do allow for freedoms like MySpace or Facebook on "company" time.
My managers don't like my attitude, see it as a weakness, and would prefer that I be tougher with my team for the sake of being tougher. I think that would only hurt my ability to deliver great results as a team leader.
Work-life balance is important, and if you're part of a team that is responsible for keeping systems running 24x7, your work life is undoubtedly going to spill over into your personal life. It's only right that we allow our personal lives to flexibility to spill over into work lives without fear of punishment.
My managers don't like my attitude, see it as a weakness, and would prefer that I be tougher with my team for the sake of being tougher
Whoa....Do I ever know that feeling ! I do the exact same as you. I just have to be a little "rigid" on those contract with Government or State agencies that have the "No Internet, No I/O Port" requirements on them.
Those can be a bit less rewarding to work on, glad I don't get too many of those.
You gentlemen are both spot on, unless your a marketing institution, I just can't see the need unless it's on their own time. They are paid to work on a specific job and only if using either of those social sites helps them, which they would have to explain to me, in no manner, fashion or form would I let them play on either site.
I try and tell even my salaried employees that they should be able to do their jobs in eight hours, people still spend longer but my point is that doesn't impress me. What impresses me is that you do your job under the time allotted and are then able to help more when needed.
Forest
Forest -
I'd like to qualify just one of your statements. Social networks are growing in popularity and companies are just starting to tap into the commercial value of these sites. I sat on Facebook for a few days with 0 friends, trying to figure out (as a software developer) the ways we could leverage the platform for our business. That was just plain silly, because you don't get the full experience until you have the interaction of friends & coworkers on it. Once you do, you see that it becomes an incredibly valuable tool for communication.
The potential for valuable commercial interaction on social networking sites reaches far beyond the marketing department. It's early yet - that potential is not realized - however the only way companies are going to get there is if people do spend the time on the platform, experimenting, brainstorming, and - yes - just plain messing around.
You know what pal, I don't have a problem with that as long as they explain it to me, but if you think for a moment that I'm going to let someone sit at their computer all day without an explanation of why they are earning their paycheck on Newsvine all day they will be fired quicker than I can get their final check out the door. Remember I live in Oregon where it's a fire at will state, and the door swings both ways.
Forest
I don't want an explanation. I just want objectives met. If my employees are meeting their objectives, I see little reason to ask for or even expect an explanation.
How many salaried employees put in more than 45 hours per week? How do we create an environment in which salaried employees enjoy going above and beyond to meet objectives, to make our product more valuable than that of our competitors? Even for those that get paid overtime, is that extra money per hour worth giving up a fraction of their personal life? It depends upon how they value their personal time and what they're doing - and if I, as a manager, can not create a workplace environment that's provides some value above and beyond the paycheck, I will lose talented individuals to other employers who do create that type of workplace and/or can pay better than I can.
Hey your talking to the same guy who provides a pool table and two upright video games for my employee's, so don't try and lecture me on making a work environment that's not healthy.
If my boys ask for a day off for almost any reason I almost always grant it, but when I need overtime to get projects done I'm also almost never turned down. Dicking around on a social web site is not my idea of work, unless you are paying yourself.
Forest
Dicking around on a social web site is not my idea of work, unless you are paying yourself.
But playing pool and video games is considered work, in your opinion?
When they are there after work and at lunch, yes I do, sometimes the guys work half the night on salary, seems fair.
Forest
Then, shouldn't they be able to use Facebook in that time instead?
Sure they could, depends on how big your company is and what they are doing. Mission specific so to speak.
Forest
Mission specific
@Forest Browne,
I thought you were from the PNW ? Yikes, I have not heard that one since my DC or NASA days...
I am, but my dad was a colonel in the Air Force, perhaps that crosses over.
Forest
OK....Then that explains it right there. My dad was a colonel in the Army, so I would pick up some of his lingo also. He always wanted to be Air Force, but Color Blindness stopped that one.
So thanks for the brain re calibration, it was getting a bit moldy up here....
My company used to not monitor my comings and goings. If I got the job done early, I would take off a day at the end of the week. If the job needed an extra 8 hours on a weekend to meet deadlines, I'd have to come in - no extra pay.
Recently, the company changed to what is more or less the standard: 40-hour work weeks. I would have no problem with that whatsoever, but the motivation to finish on time is now gone. Whereas I used to be able to get a free day at the beach in the summer due to working very hard on other days, no longer.
So, I fill my time on the web instead. I don't personally use facebook/myspace. In my opinion, if you are getting your work done on time, it shouldn't matter.
Personally, I believe that workers ought to be trusted to complete tasks on their own, rather than to be grounded by the boss and only allowed to visit certain sites. In an ideal world, employers would simply fire those employees who weren't getting work done in a timely fashion, and let that be the deterrent to keep people off Facebook, or keep their time to a minimum.
At the place I work, there are literally no internet bans in place -- workers could be looking at porn or streaming TV sites all day if they really wanted to. That said, everyone in my workplace works extremely hard, and if you spent too much extra time on a non-work-related site, you'd get fired pretty quickly, I'm sure.
I love that I'm allowed to visit forums and social networking and bookmarking sites at work -- otherwise I wouldn't be able to keep up on Newsvine!
If people get their work done, and do it well. Who cares?
What's next, going to take away pen & paper so people can't doodle?
Works Finished??? Do more work. You get paid from start to finish of the day. Not start to part of the day.
If people can take smoke breaks. I should be able to check facebook. ;]
Word, jfrank.
Yes in lieu of a smoke . Social networking should be allocated an equal amounbt of 'smoko time.'
jfrank. You get paid for a days work. If you finish a project ask for another or help someone with theirs. Company's that are too lax on Internet use will eventually figure out the financial costs of such errors, called bankruptcy. Funny how groups that tout the need to be globally connected can not see the global competition from countries where employees work harder,longer and do not expect childish perks like this. Keep working your way out of a job. India, Pakistan, China will all do the same thing cheaper without mistakes. I guess you can work on your face-book profile all you want waiting in line at the unemployment office.
I think the policy of honesty and mutual respect is the best. I respect my company for the leeway that I have in my job to set my schedule and yes browse Facebook (or MSNBC) occasionally during the day, and in turn they respect me for the work that I provide. I work from home most of the time and pretty much manage my own accounts so if I wanted to I could slack off all day but it would catch up with me in the end when I am not producing as much for the company, I am sure after a while of that I would be let go. The company I work for trusts their employees judgment and understands their is a work / life balance and I really appreciate that.
More to the point, given the sense of entitlement Gen Yers and millennials bring to the workplace, will blocking access to social networking sites make those companies that adopt that approach less competitive? There's a chance it will, sort of like when I was younger, how we all avoided working for companies that administered mandatory drug testing...
On the other hand, sunnyside's comment above illustrates a problem employers face when circumstances 'suggest' or 'obligate' the company to abandon task-centric approaches to employee time in favor of the 'I pay you for forty hours, I want forty hours' approach - I'm the boss, and I won't waste time in the office when there's nothing to do or I have gotten everything I needed to do done. I can't simply extend the same privilege to my workers, often precisely because someone has to hold down the fort.
It will be interesting to see how this shakes out. When times are tough, casual Fridays and flextime are usually the first to go flying out the window.
A VW manager whose name I don't recall said: "I pay people for their heads not their asses". Your relationship to Facebook only matters when you start slipping up on your work. Then they'll get you for it ::wicked grin::
What's next, going to take away pen & paper so people can't doodle?
If you work in a T-Mobile call center then yes, they will take your pen and paper. Kleenex, too.
A co-worker of mine is in some potential hot water over a Twitter post. On the one hand, there's nothing in his posts or his profile linking him with said company. On the other hand, sometimes the whip needs to be cracked. I guess.
In an ideal world, this stuff shouldn't matter. Problem is, though, that this isn't an ideal world, so while you may be able to surf FaceBook and seed Newsvine and get your work done, the guy in the next office may only be able to do one thing at a time, and if it's not work, then it's the former (or something else). It's easier and more efficient for companies to just out-and-out ban something for everyone than to try and police every single individuals activity (and if they do police everyones activity, it's probably for security or liability reasons).
The fact is this.... When working at a company you are using their equipment and resources. Therefore, they can control how you use them.
Actually the business world has become so lax since the Internet was formed. Too much time is spent surfing the web or checking personal emails. Remember you are being paid to do a job, not surf the net. It doesn't matter whether you can get your job done or not. If you finish your job and still have time to surf the net, then you have time to do MORE WORK.
Regards,
A business owner who is watching his profits fly down the internet with each keystroke.
It's only acceptable if you don't have something else do to - or you aren't paid for working overtime.
You're getting paid to work. You are not getting paid to surf Facebook or MySpace. Think of it like this. You are using your company's expensive computer and bandwidth so that you can see if your buddy updated his profile pic.
Thank you. Some logic at last.
'Social Networking Site 'Facebook' Could Be Trouble for Users - And Here's Why'
A warning from last November, I think. I'm not trying to hijack this thread, but before you get too carried away with FaceLove, you should know what you are getting into.
The biggest problem here isn't that you SHOULD use facebook while working, it's that your employer thinks you're not mature enough to avoid wasting time and that they have to constantly hold your hand. Imagine a parent disconnecting the television to get their children to stop watching it and do their homework. Reasonable enough. Now imagine the same thing, only their children are in COLLEGE.
I'll admit, there are people who are irresponsible and cannot function without excessive micromanagement. This isn't a problem with facebook or the internet, it's a problem with them; unless you check in every five minutes they will find a way to waste time. But for the rest of us, this sort of thing is demeaning and fosters a bad atmosphere. They might as well mandate chastity belts so people don't spend all day whacking off in the bathrooms.
Given that companies pay for business internet access, they have the right to restrict it as they choose; we employees have no right to complain. Better to restrict, than to simply monitor and then fire somebody.
If part of your job responsibility, however, includes internet access for business purposes, the company should not restrict what you need to get to. AND, employers should be responsible to keep their employees supplied with productive work. Part of the problem of excessive company-time surfing is companies that keep employees sitting around without enough to do.
Most of us take it for granted, but it's curious how, when we are at work, we give up many of the rights we have when we're off the clock.
I guess that's why they call it "wage slavery".
Doesn't that also bring up another issue that should be of concern. Think about this communications extravaganza we have evolved into, but for the salaried worker this new technology can actually force you to bring your work home and they can track it. Nothing like having your boss give you kudos for sending out e-mails at midnight, thus showing your commitment to the cause.
It goes even farther as the tracking goes into your car whenever you take your phone with you with, I've had customers load up tracking software that tells where all of their employees are when not at the office. It gets worse when it shows when their movements have stopped for more than five minutes and how fast they were going.
This big world is getting smaller and time to yourself will be harder to procure.
Forest
Good points, Forest.
While it hasn't happened so frequently of late, I've had some of my best work-related inspirations when I was on my own time.
This big world is getting smaller and time to yourself will be harder to procure.
This is a good reason to do work that one finds personally (not just financially) rewarding.
I don't get paid if I'm not working on a project since I am a contractor. While I'm waiting for my next task I usually go on Newsvine and Facebook and my employer doesn't mind. My boss even accepted my facebook friend invite during work hours.
I think that it largely depends on what it is that you do and the environment in which you work. If you are contracted employee and are paid for completing a project then it is at your discretion to surf. But if you earn hourly wages and there is work to do you should not surf. Recently at my place of employment several of our departments had their Internet access turned off. We all grumbled because it is nice to have Internet but the grumbling didn't last long because after all we are on company time, using company computers, not sitting at home at our desk.
I think it's fine for me to spend a little time on Facebook/MySpace, etc.. Unlike all of the other employees where I work, I come to work every day(2 sick days in 13 years even though we are paid for them), I don't take ten "smoke breaks" a day and I actually work for most of the time I am here. If I want to pop on and check my messages or chat for a few minutes a day I don't think there's anything wrong with it. It breaks the monotony of a boring day and actually helps to get my head back in the game.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |